Subscribe to RSS feed
Video Tutorials
Presentation, contests, giveaways
About / Contact me

“Using Macs in Trial II” - Day Two - Clarity Legal Software

March 3rd, 2008 by Brett Burney

Before the demo from Clarity Legal Software, the attorneys from Foreman, Lewis & Hutchison (the hosts of this fine seminar) showed how they re-enact a client’s story in their office so they can better understand a case.

When they were done re-enacting the scenes from a tragic death of a client in police custody, Rafe Foreman turned to the audience and allowed us to shout out questions we had after watching the re-enactment. Kern Lewis listed the questions as they were blurted out, and then we all went through a few of the questions suggesting appropriate images to use on Keynote slides to tell the story. Kern explained that this approach is outlined in Cliff Atkinson’s Beyond Bullet Points book (now updated for PowerPoint 2007).

I’ve heard Cliff speak before and he tells a fascinating story of helping attorney Mark Lanier tell the plaintiff’s story in the Vioxx litigation.

Then John Callis of Clarity Legal Software took the seat at the head of the class. Unfortunately, I did not have much previous experience with Clarity products, but I had heard so many great things about John and his group, that I was really looking forward to hearing him speak.

I was impressed that John was one of only two full-time employees at Clarity, and John is himself the chief software developer. This was significant because I saw him take notes for future features as the audience gave him feedback and asked questions.

John is gracious and sincere, thanking many of his customers in the audience and honestly answering all the questions that were thrown at him (and there were a lot). John was only there for a few hours because he had to get back to a trial he was supporting himself down in South Texas.

John explained that Clarity started in 2006 as a Mac-based company, but they now develop for Windows and Linux in addition to the Mac. Their two main products are DepoSmart (transcript manager) and TrialSmart (trial presentation).

John first went through DepoSmart which can import a wide variety of transcript formats from ASCII to LiveNote to Summation. DepoSmart also accepts a wide variety of video files and allows you synchronize the text and video yourself if you so choose (Clarity will do it for you as well).

DepoSmart will also easily import text and video that is already synchronized. For example, a court reporter or co-counsel can send you a transcript and video that had been synchronized in Trial Director or Sanction, and DepoSmart will accept that just fine.

A question came up regarding RealLegal’s E-Transcript file format which usually gets delivered to attorneys from court reporters in .PTX format. While DepoSmart cannot accept the proprietary .PTX format, it’s a simple task to download the free E-Transcript Viewer from RealLegal that will allow you to view the nicely formatted .PTX file, or convert it to a .TXT file (which will import easily into DepoSmart). The only problem is that on the Mac side, RealLegal only supports “Mac Classic Mode” which pre-dates the Intel switch. Since most Macs in use today run on the Intel processor, some suggested using Parallels or VMware Fusion to run Windows and use the free E-Transcript Viewer to convert the .PTX file to .TXT. But instead of firing up a full virtual machine, someone recommended just using CrossOver Mac instead. This will run the Windows version of the E-Transcript Viewer just fine without requiring a full, virtual Windows environment. I tried this and it worked flawlessly.

Next, John Callis gave a demo on TrialSmart, which has become a simpler, but very viable, alternative to Sanction or Trial Director. John honestly admits that TrialSmart is not going to give you all the bells and whistles that you’ll find in those two competitors, but if all you need is an easy-to-understand and stable trial presentation application with basic features, then TrialSmart could be your best option. And if you’re looking for a native-Mac trial application, it is the ONLY option. Clarity Legal Software is one of the few software companies that are truly focused on the Mac-using legal market (as evidenced by their name).

A few features in TrialSmart that got me and the crowd excited were 1) the ability to move documents around on the screen once you pull them up in presentation mode; 2) the ability to re-size video and documents in presentation mode; and 3) an “image preview” window that can live on your primary monitor so you can see what you’ll be showing on your secondary monitor (the projector in the court room). Clarity provides several excellent video tutorials and list of features on their site.

I was extremely impressed with John and his products and I plan to incorporate them into my own repertoire very soon. Even more important, it was evident that John was focused on giving the Mac legal community some functional software, and reacts to support requests as quickly as possible.

Guest post by Brett Burney.

2 Responses to ““Using Macs in Trial II” - Day Two - Clarity Legal Software”

  1. Wagner Says:

    Brett,

    Nice post. This seminar was great. Near year’s conference will be even better. Sorry we didn’t get a chance to meet.

    Thanks for posing this seminar. You’re efforts are appreciated.

    One of the reasons we like TrialSmart SOOO much is that it actually doesn’t have all the “bells and whistles” that you mentioned. It’s actually a software WE CAN USE. We could never put our paralegal or assocation/partner in front of Sanction or TrialDirector or Visionary because the interface is hard to understand. We’d have to hire a consultant to do this stuff in the past but now we can take our MacBooks/Air to trial with us with a paralegal or associate that knows the case.

    Most of the bells and whistles that you mention in TrialDirector and Sanction are things that can actually be done in the OS on the Mac OS X (i.e. file renaming, bates stamping, redactions, etc.) through Preview or Automator. I think it’s a decision that Clarity consciously made when designing the software. Most of the trial presentation apps copy each other, Clarity is trying to be different. John, the developer, does alot of trial work and he knows the pitfalls.

    BTW - One of the bells and whistle it does have that the PC guys don’t - PDF file imports.

    Thanks again for the blog of the conference. I found myself going reading it daily.

    Wagner

  2. Rich Says:

    We used TrialDirector before and couldn’t figure it out. It looks very powerful. I think many of the features got in the way of presenting stuff. So, we found TrialSmart and it’s much easier to use.

    Instead of trying to be all things to all people in 1 software (Verdict System and Indata), Clarity just wants to break things into digestible parts.

    I liked seeing Kern use the SmartBoard. Gives me ideas in my practice.

    I enjoyed these 2 days immensely.

Leave a Reply